Skip to content

The M.O. of Lawlessness- A Comparative Analysis of Duress and Intentional Deception

September 29, 2013
Deborah Krekic
Hey Attorneys and JUDGES case yah missed it the first time I am REVISITING: DURESS AND INTENTIONAL DECEPTION Rule of Law and perceptions of the majority under duress aka intentional deception: leads those without enough evidence of the truth to wrong conclusions…During the decades of contesting the States many violations of the Constitutions Establishment Clause, I’ve learned that the rule of law …is determined upon the perception of a normal/typical person in a matter, what the majority would perceive. That rule of law however becomes invalid and a mute point if the normal/typical person perception has been manipulated by intentional deception so that the majority of people could not see nor perceive the reality, or the truth of the matter. Visit Aug28,2011 Archives Post by Stephen Michael Schroeder WORDWarriorDebinflorida.blogspot.com in case you missed it first time…
Schroeder v.s. The State of Indiana AKA the pagan goddess Ceres 08/08/2011Since the I.C.L.U only challenges Christian violations of the Establishment Clause and it looks like I will have to challenge the State on my own, please excuse any ‘error of technicality’ you may find along the way. I am not a lawyer, but I am quite capable of defending myself and prevailing in contests such as these.

During the decades of contesting the States many violations of the Constitutions Establishment Clause, I’ve learned that the rule of law is determined upon the perception of a normal/typical person in a matter, what the majority would perceive. That rule of law however becomes invalid and a mute point if the normal/typical person perception has been manipulated by intentional deception so that the majority of people could not see nor perceive the reality, or the truth of the matter.

And that is exactly what has happened at the Indiana State Capitol with the Apotheosis.

The State of Indiana intentionally misled the citizens of the State by concealing the true identity of the larger than life image of the goddess, front and center, 24-7 in the Capitol.

The deception by the State to conceal this and many other matters has prevented the normal/typical person from realizing the facts that the State of Indiana has violated State and Federal Laws, namely the Establishment Clause by placing the image of a pagan goddess in the State Capitols House Chamber declaring the State has been apotheosized into a Deity, a God, without any complaints from any of this citizens of this Bible Belt for 50 years now…how else could you explain a thing other than these citizens being blinded by intentional deception so that they would not see, nor complain of such an offense such as this?

Therefore the rule of law that takes into consideration what the normal/typical person would perceive in this matter does not apply in this case. The deception by the State can be verified by review of the Contract signed in 1961 for the Apotheosis of Indiana, the making of the State into a Deity, and not just any deity, a bloodthirsty war goddess whose most sacred of sacrifices was the unborn fetus, which explains why it was Federal Judge David Hamilton, the enforcer of this ‘Law of Ceres’ (abortion) to be the Judge to ban Christians from speaking the name of their God in the House, while allowing the Anti-Christian Muslims to speak the name of their Anti-Christ god, Allah in the very same House that the name of this pagan fertility triple goddess is spoken daily by tour guides, and proclaimed proudly in State brochures.

The State has defended this violation of law as ‘mythical art’ but the same could be said about a painting of the Last Supper, however it’s placement in the House Chambers would be perceived by one and all as an unlawful preference to Christianity by the State, and thus removed promptly, thus this case has already been won for me by the States ‘self-inflicted’ wound of setting case precedence for the House Chambers at the Capitol.”  Stephen Michael Schroeder

  • Deborah Krekic– The state of Florida promotes and defends the Wrongful Death and Caps using the same tactics…Judge Deborah ANALYIST
    FB REPOST- HOW BOUT THIS ONE FOR ANOTHER INTERESTING ASPECT OF MY TAMPA FLORIDA TRIAL as I am a resident of NYS …
    ATTENTION ALL Interest Analyists!? http://www2.law.mercer.edu/lawreview/getfile.cfm… The New York rule of unlimited recovery for wrongful death in Rosenthal v. Warren7 protected New York plaintiffs, and so on. Let us begin by examining the fundamental premises of interest analysis. Notwithstanding the elegant vocabulary in which it is draped,
    Currie’s theory largely-at least in tort cases-involves substituting
    personal connecting factors for territorial ones. In other words, interest
    analysts faced with an interstate tort case are usually much more
    concerned with where the parties are residents, domiciled, incorporated,
    or headquartered than they are with where the injury took place. Of
    course, the analysts are not always just concerned with personal
    connecting factors, and they do not always ignore the territorial ones.
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: