Skip to content

Medical Malpractice Discovery Components of a Sentinel Event Death in Hospitals

January 1, 2013

Risk Mangagement, Standards of Care, Hospitals, Doctors, Nurses, Technicians, Teaching Universities, Boards of Trustees, State Agency for Health Care, Joint Commission Of Accredation of Health Organizations, Patient Safey reporting and under reporting, public administrative decisions showing repeat violations and complaints, traumatic and adverse incidents, report standards and under reporting and what about Actionable FRAUD?

Excerpt Written by: Gregory G. Brown, Certified Trial Specialist and Attorney in California from his blog:   “Fraud and/or Misrepresentation–When does it become actionable? “Often, statements made in the business setting are incorrect, less than truthful or even complete lies. A representation may be made orally, in writing or by nonverbal conduct. However, claims for fraud or misrepresentation must meet specific elements to be considered actionable.   1.   Fraud Generally   Fraud is an intentional tort. For a claim to be successful on this basis, there must an element of fraudulent intent, or an intent to deceive.This intent distinguishes a statement from actionable negligent misrepresentation and from non-actionable innocent misrepresentation.   2.   Intentional Misrepresentation   For a claim for intentional misrepresentation to be valid, a party must show that defendant represented that an important fact was true, that representation was actually false, defendant knew the statement was false when it was made (or made it recklessly without regard for the truth), defendant intended the party to rely on the representation, the party indeed reasonably relied on the representation and was harmed by it and that reliance was a substantial factor in causing the harm. For example, in a real estate transaction, a statement by a seller that the roofing on the house was”installed last week” when it was actually 2 years old, would be an intentional misrepresentation if buyer reasonably relied on this statement and was ultimately harmed by it.   3.   Concealment   Concealment is a common scenario whereby a party to a contract intentionally conceals an important fact. To prove as such, defendant must have intentionally failed to disclose an important fact, the other party was unaware of the fact, defendant intends to deceive by concealing the fact, the party reasonably relied on the representation and was harmed by it and that reliance was a substantial factor in causing the harm. Concealment arises most frequently in situations where there is a legal or financial relationship (“fiduciary duty”) between the parties, such as business partners.   4.   Negligent Misrepresentation   Misrepresentations that are not intentional may still be actionable. The elements for negligent misrepresentation are nearly the same to those for intentional misrepresentation except that for negligent misrepresentation defendant need not know a statement was false when made. Instead, although defendant may have honestly believed that the representation was true, they had no reasonable grounds for believing its truth when the statement was made. If the statements were reckless or no true belief in their validity exists, a statement will still be considered intentional misrepresentation.   5.   Opinions–usually not covered   Ordinarily, a statement of opinion made by a party typically does not form a basis for actionable fraud. An opinion in this context is best describe as a person’s belief that a fact exists, a statement regarding a future event, or a judgment about quality, value or authenticity. A statement of opinion may form a basis for fraud if it is made by an expert with special knowledge, declared in a manner so as to be construed as true, there is a special relationship or trust between the parties, or some other special reason which would allow reasonable reliance on the statement as truth.   6.   Conclusion   There are countless variations of fraud, misrepresentation and deceit. The nuances between the different types are often difficult to ascertain. It is important to consult with an experienced fraud/business attorney if a party feels they have been a victim of fraud. “

Additional Resources,.html

Risk Management- Is patient safety number 1? Or do other considerations come first? Financial Market Share Stakes , Human Safety, Product Lability, Regulatory Liability,or Environmental.

Is the hospital following it’s own risk management policies in a  systematic and structured way? Is it transparent and inclusive? Hospitals have corporate fiduciary responsibilities to patients.  Their own administrative compliance affects their accreditation and licensure standards. What is the evidence base available, upon discovery, to determine how well the system works.

Outcome of care and shared responsibility should not be assumed to be working well, at every institution that claims a high standard of care. Take the time to investigate the public statistics before you become one, when choosing a health care facility. Health care errors and injuries do  occur more often than people realize and sometimes without the knowledge or involvement of a physician. Do not assume the physician responsible has actually examined the patient directly or checked to see that orders were followed.  Do not assume that teaching hospitals are more qualified than other private facilities when in fact, through discovery, they may not live up to their advertising claims.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: